Textual curators and writing machines: authorial agency in encyclopedias, print to digital

From WikiLit
Jump to: navigation, search
Publication (help)
Textual curators and writing machines: authorial agency in encyclopedias, print to digital
Authors: Krista A. Kennedy [edit item]
Citation: University of Minnesota  : . 2009. United States, Minnesota.
Publication type: Thesis
Peer-reviewed: Yes
Database(s):
DOI: Define doi.
Google Scholar cites: Citations
Link(s): Paper link
Added by Wikilit team: Added on initial load
Search
Article: Google Scholar BASE PubMed
Other scholarly wikis: AcaWiki Brede Wiki WikiPapers
Web search: Bing Google Yahoo!Google PDF
Other:
Services
Format: BibTeX
Textual curators and writing machines: authorial agency in encyclopedias, print to digital is a publication by Krista A. Kennedy.


[edit] Abstract

Wikipedia is often discussed as the first of its kind: the first massively collaborative, Web-based encyclopedia that belongs to the public domain. While it's true that wiki technology enables large-scale, distributed collaborations in revolutionary ways, the concept of a collaborative encyclopedia is not new, and neither is the idea that private ownership might not apply to such documents. More than 275 years ago, in the preface to the 1728 edition of his Cyclop�dia , Ephraim Chambers mused on the intensely collaborative nature of the volumes he was about to publish. His thoughts were remarkably similar to contemporary intellectual property arguments for Wikipedia , and while the composition processes involved in producing these texts are influenced by the available technologies, they are also unexpectedly similar. This dissertation examines issues of authorial agency in these two texts and shows that the {Author} Construct" is not static across eras genres or textual technologies. In contrast to traditional considerations of the poetic author the encyclopedic author demonstrates a different form of authorial agency that operates within strict genre conventions and does not place a premium on originality. This and related variations challenge contemporary ideas concerning the divide between print and digital authorship as well as the notion that new media intellectual property arguments are without historical precedent."

[edit] Research questions

"This dissertation examines issues of authorial agency in these two texts and shows that the “Author Construct” is not static across eras, genres, or textual technologies. This dissertation is a comparative case study grounded in rhetorical analysis."

Research details

Topics: Encyclopedias [edit item]
Domains: Rhetoric [edit item]
Theory type: Explanation [edit item]
Wikipedia coverage: Main topic [edit item]
Theories: "I rely on Lloyd Bitzer’s model of rhetorical situation as a way of considering the ways in which central rhetorical factors are constituted and influenced by fluctuating external forces" [edit item]
Research design: Case study [edit item]
Data source: Wikipedia pages [edit item]
Collected data time dimension: Longitudinal [edit item]
Unit of analysis: Website [edit item]
Wikipedia data extraction: Live Wikipedia [edit item]
Wikipedia page type: Article, History [edit item]
Wikipedia language: English [edit item]

[edit] Conclusion

"authorship is a fluctuating construct that alters according to textual and rhetorical situation."

[edit] Comments

"authorship is a fluctuating construct that alters according to textual and rhetorical situation."


Further notes[edit]