Browse wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Legitimizing Wikipedia: how US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage
Abstract Within only a few years, the collaborativeWithin only a few years, the collaborative online encyclopedia Wikipedia has become one of the most popular websites in the world. At the same time, Wikipedia has become the subject of much controversy because of inaccuracies and hoaxes found in some of its entries. Journalists, therefore, have remained skeptical about the reliability and accuracy of Wikipedia's information, despite the fact that research has consistently shown an overall high level of accuracy compared to traditional encyclopedia. This study analyzed the framing of Wikipedia and its use as a news source by five US national newspapers over an eight-year period. A content analysis of 1486 Wikipedia references in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Christian Science Monitor found that Wikipedia is framed predominantly neutral and positive, and that it is increasingly used as a news source. By framing Wikipedia as credible and accurate, the newspapers help legitimize the use of the online encyclopedia. By allowing Wikipedia to influence their news agendas as a source, the newspapers confirm the growing reliability of Wikipedia.firm the growing reliability of Wikipedia.
Added by wikilit team Added on initial load  +
Collected data time dimension Longitudinal  +
Comments "Newspapers increasingly frame Wikipedia in a positive light, and some of them also frame the encyclopedia as an accurate source of information." N/A: The unit of analysis for the study was the Wikipedia reference in the Article
Conclusion While the five newspapers use hundreds of While the five newspapers use hundreds of sources on a daily basis and have used Wikipedia only 161 times as a source in eight years, the trend of the last two years shows a greater acceptance for the online encyclopedia. Despite wildly publicized inaccuracies and hoaxes, Wikipedia has developed into a source on which renowned news publications rely in their information-gathering process. The results of this study underline that the use of Wikipedia is much more than the “sneak into print” that Shaw (2008) suggested. The wide use of Wikipedia as a simple mention in many articles also underlines this. While the reporting on the Wikipedia phenomenon is likely to subside over time, references to Wikipedia can be expected to increase. The results of this study only reflect the use of Wikipedia as a news source in the first years of the online encyclopedia's existence, and naturally this use has increased from a low starting level. Future research should continue to track this trend to analyze whether Wikipedia becomes a routine source of information for news-gathering purposes. The most significant finding of this study is that newspapers increasingly frame Wikipedia in a positive light, and some of them also frame the encyclopedia as an accurate source of information. The more Wikipedia is cited by the news media, the greater the agenda-setting influence of the online encyclopedia will become. The growing credibility of Wikipedia with media and public alike also has the potential of leading to a growing acceptance of it. If the public views Wikipedia as credible, journalists are more likely to rely on it. And if journalists rely on Wikipedia, the public is more likely to view it as credible.lic is more likely to view it as credible.
Data source Documents  +
Doi 10.1080/17512786.2010.506060 +
Google scholar url http://scholar.google.com/scholar?ie=UTF-8&q=%22Legitimizing%2BWikipedia%3A%2Bhow%2BUS%2Bnational%2Bnewspapers%2Bframe%2Band%2Buse%2Bthe%2Bonline%2Bencyclopedia%2Bin%2Btheir%2Bcoverage%22  +
Has author Marcus Messner + , Jeff South +
Has domain Communications + , Journalism +
Has topic News source + , Reader perceptions of credibility +
Peer reviewed yes  +
Publication type Journal article  +
Published in Journalism Practice +
Research design Content analysis  +
Research questions The goal of this study, therefore, was to The goal of this study, therefore, was to examine the framing of Wikipedia and the use of it as a news source. A content analysis of five national US newspapers—The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Christian Science Monitor—was conducted to explore how the online encyclopedia is covered, and how it is cited. RQ1:How do newspapers frame Wikipedia?RQ2:Do newspapers use Wikipedia as a source?RQ3:In which contexts do newspapers use Wikipedia as a source?s do newspapers use Wikipedia as a source?
Revid 10,853  +
Theories McCombs (2005) defined five stages of agenMcCombs (2005) defined five stages of agenda-setting theory: (1) issue agenda-setting, (2) attribute agenda-setting, (3) psychology of agenda-setting effects, (4) sources of the media agenda, and (5) consequences of agenda-setting. This study explores two of these areas: how attributes in media coverage frame the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, and how the media use it as a source. According to Gamson (1989), framing theory helps to analyze how certain attributes of information are emphasized over others. It is important to understand how the media frame an issue when there are a variety of options to present the information. The selection of specific facts and their interpretation have the potential to shape public opinion and influence the public's agenda (Mahon and Wartick, 2003). When journalists choose a frame for an issue, they make a consequential decision that will influence the story, but also its reader's perception of the issue (McCombs and Shaw, 1993). Wanta et al. (2004) stressed that the public learns the importance of an issue based on the amount of coverage it receives.sed on the amount of coverage it receives.
Theory type Analysis  +
Title Legitimizing Wikipedia: how US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage
Unit of analysis N/A  +
Url http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/17512786.2010.506060  +
Wikipedia coverage Main topic  +
Wikipedia data extraction N/A  +
Wikipedia language English  +
Wikipedia page type N/A  +
Year 2010  +
Creation dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 15 March 2012 20:29:30  +
Categories News source  + , Reader perceptions of credibility  + , Communications  + , Journalism  + , Publications  +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 30 January 2014 20:29:26  +
hide properties that link here 
  No properties link to this page.
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.