Governance in social media: a case study of the Wikipedia promotion process

From WikiLit
Jump to: navigation, search
Publication (help)
Governance in social media: a case study of the Wikipedia promotion process
Authors: Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg [edit item]
Citation: Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media  : 98-105. 2010 April 20.
Publication type: Conference paper
Peer-reviewed: Yes
Database(s): arXiv (arXiv/1004.3547) CiteULike
DOI: Define doi.
Google Scholar cites: Citations
Link(s): Paper link
Added by Wikilit team: Yes
Search
Article: Google Scholar BASE PubMed
Other scholarly wikis: AcaWiki Brede Wiki WikiPapers
Web search: Bing Google Yahoo!Google PDF
Other:
Services
Format: BibTeX
Governance in social media: a case study of the Wikipedia promotion process is a publication by Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg.


[edit] Abstract

Social media sites are often guided by a core group of committed users engaged in various forms of governance. A crucial aspect of this type of governance is deliberation, inwhich such a group reaches decisions on issues of importance to the site. Despite its crucial — though subtle — role in how a number of prominent social media sites function, there has been relatively little investigation of the deliberative aspects of social media governance. Here we explore this issue, investigating a particular deliberative process that is extensive, public, and recorded: the promotion of Wikipedia admins, which is determined by elections that engage committed members of the Wikipedia community. We find that the group decision-making at the heart of this process exhibits several fundamental forms of relative assessment. First we observe that the chance that a voter will support a candidate is strongly dependent on the relationship between characteristics of the voter and the candidate. Second we investigate how both individual voter decisions and overall election outcomes can be based on models that take into account the sequential, public nature of the voting.

[edit] Research questions

"What determines the chances that a voter would vote for a user's promotion to admin status? What are the voting patterns seen?"

Research details

Topics: Deliberative collaboration, Policies and governance, Social order [edit item]
Domains: Computer science [edit item]
Theory type: Analysis [edit item]
Wikipedia coverage: Main topic [edit item]
Theories: ""theories of sequential expressions of opinion in on-line settings

(Wu and Huberman 2008); these theories argue that such deviations represent a tendency for users to be more motivated to express an opinion when it goes against the prevailing outcome"; "theories of herding and information cascades"" [edit item]

Research design: Econometrics and time series, Statistical analysis [edit item]
Data source: Wikipedia pages [edit item]
Collected data time dimension: Longitudinal [edit item]
Unit of analysis: Edit, User [edit item]
Wikipedia data extraction: Dump [edit item]
Wikipedia page type: Article:talk, User, User:talk, History, Policy, Policy:talk, Collaboration and coordination [edit item]
Wikipedia language: English [edit item]

[edit] Conclusion

"We find that the group decision-making at the heart of this process exhibits several fundamental forms of relative assessment. First we observe that the chance that a voter will support a candidate is strongly dependent on the relationship between characteristics of the voter and the candidate. Second we investigate how both individual voter decisions and overall election outcomes can be based on models that take into account the sequential, public nature of the voting."

[edit] Comments


Further notes[edit]

Facts about "Governance in social media: a case study of the Wikipedia promotion process"RDF feed
AbstractSocial media sites are often guided by a cSocial media sites are often guided by a core group of committed

users engaged in various forms of governance. A crucial aspect of this type of governance is deliberation, inwhich such a group reaches decisions on issues of importance to the site. Despite its crucial — though subtle — role in how a number of prominent social media sites function, there has been relatively little investigation of the deliberative aspects of social media governance. Here we explore this issue, investigating a particular deliberative process that is extensive, public, and recorded: the promotion of Wikipedia admins, which is determined by elections that engage committed members of the Wikipedia community. We find that the group decision-making at the heart of this process exhibits several fundamental forms of relative assessment. First we observe that the chance that a voter will support a candidate is strongly dependent on the relationship between characteristics of the voter and the candidate. Second we investigate how both individual voter decisions and overall election outcomes can be based on models that take

into account the sequential, public nature of the voting.
e sequential, public nature of the voting.
Added by wikilit teamYes +
Collected data time dimensionLongitudinal +
ConclusionWe find that the group decision-making at We find that the group decision-making at the heart

of this process exhibits several fundamental forms of relative assessment. First we observe that the chance that a voter will support a candidate is strongly dependent on the relationship between characteristics of the voter and the candidate. Second we investigate how both individual voter decisions and overall election outcomes can be based on models that take

into account the sequential, public nature of the voting.
e sequential, public nature of the voting.
Data sourceWikipedia pages +
Dates20 +
Google scholar urlhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?ie=UTF-8&q=%22Governance%2Bin%2Bsocial%2Bmedia%3A%2Ba%2Bcase%2Bstudy%2Bof%2Bthe%2BWikipedia%2Bpromotion%2Bprocess%22 +
Has authorJure Leskovec +, Daniel Huttenlocher + and Jon Kleinberg +
Has domainComputer science +
Has topicDeliberative collaboration +, Policies and governance + and Social order +
MonthApril +
Pages98-105 +
Peer reviewedYes +
Publication typeConference paper +
Published inFourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media +
Research designEconometrics and time series + and Statistical analysis +
Research questionsWhat determines the chances that a voter would vote for a user's promotion to admin status? What are the voting patterns seen?
Revid10,793 +
Theories"theories of sequential expressions of opi"theories of sequential expressions of opinion in on-line settings

(Wu and Huberman 2008); these theories argue that such deviations represent a tendency for users to be more motivated to express an opinion when it goes against the prevailing

outcome"; "theories of herding and information cascades"
ories of herding and information cascades"
Theory typeAnalysis +
TitleGovernance in social media: a case study of the Wikipedia promotion process
Unit of analysisEdit + and User +
Urlhttp://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1485/1841 +
Wikipedia coverageMain topic +
Wikipedia data extractionDump +
Wikipedia languageEnglish +
Wikipedia page typeArticle:talk +, User +, User:talk +, History +, Policy +, Policy:talk + and Collaboration and coordination +
Year2010 +