Commons-based peer production and virtue

From WikiLit
Jump to: navigation, search
Publication (help)
Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue
Authors: Yochai Benkler, Helen Nissenbaum [edit item]
Citation: The Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4): 394–419. 2006.
Publication type: Journal article
Peer-reviewed: Yes
Database(s):
DOI: Define doi.
Google Scholar cites: Citations
Link(s): Paper link
Added by Wikilit team: Added on initial load
Search
Article: Google Scholar BASE PubMed
Other scholarly wikis: AcaWiki Brede Wiki WikiPapers
Web search: Bing Google Yahoo!Google PDF
Other:
Services
Format: BibTeX
Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue is a publication by Yochai Benkler, Helen Nissenbaum.


[edit] Abstract

COMMONS-BASED peer production is a socio-economic system of production that is emerging in the digitally networked environment. Facilitated by the technical infrastructure of the Internet, the hallmark of this socio-technical system is collaboration among large groups of individuals, sometimes in the order of tens or even hundreds of thousands, who cooperate effectively to provide information, knowledge or cultural goods without relying on either market pricing or managerial hierarchies to coordinate their common enterprise.1 While there are many practical reasons to try to understand a novel system of production that has produced some of the finest software, the fastest supercomputer and some of the best web-based directories and news sites, here we focus on the ethical, rather than the functional dimension. What does it mean in ethical terms that many individuals can find themselves cooperating productively with strangers and acquaintances on a scope never before seen? How might it affect, or at least enable, human action and affection, and how would these effects or possibilities affect our capacities to be virtuous human beings? We suggest that the emergence of peer production offers an opportunity for more people to engage in practices that permit them to exhibit and experience virtuous behavior. We posit: (a) that a society that provides opportunities for virtuous behavior is one that is more conducive to virtuous individuals; and (b) that the practice of effective virtuous behavior may lead to more people adopting virtues as their own, or as attributes of what they see as their self-definition. The central thesis of this paper is that socio-technical systems of commons-based peer production offer not only a remarkable medium of production for various kinds of information goods but serve as a context for positive character formation. Exploring and substantiating these claims will be our quest, but we begin with a brief tour through this strange and exciting new landscape of commons-based peer production and conclude with recommendations for public policy.

[edit] Research questions

"What does it mean in ethical terms that many individuals can find themselves cooperating productively with strangers and acquaintances on a scope never before seen? How might it affect, or at least enable, human action and affection, and how would these effects or possibilities affect our capacities to be virtuous human beings?"

Research details

Topics: Deliberative collaboration [edit item]
Domains: Information systems [edit item]
Theory type: Analysis, Explanation [edit item]
Wikipedia coverage: Case [edit item]
Theories: [edit item]
Research design: Case study [edit item]
Data source: Websites [edit item]
Collected data time dimension: N/A [edit item]
Unit of analysis: N/A [edit item]
Wikipedia data extraction: N/A [edit item]
Wikipedia page type: N/A [edit item]
Wikipedia language: N/A [edit item]

[edit] Conclusion

"We have argued that participation in commons-based peer production fosters important moral and political virtues. We have not made the case that it is therefore incumbent upon the state to support peer production. That would require a greater commitment to a perfectionist state agenda than we have stated or defended here, or are willing to defend. Nonetheless, we have offered new reasons to find peer production to be a morally attractive set of social, cultural and economic practices. There is a growing literature on the relative efficiency of peer production in many domains of information production, and some exploration of its attractiveness from the perspective of a variety of liberal commitments: to democracy, autonomy and social justice."

[edit] Comments


Further notes[edit]