Access, claims and quality on the Internet - future challenges
|Access, claims and quality on the Internet - future challenges|
|Authors:||Kim H. Veltman|
|Citation:||Progress in Informatics (2): 17-40. 2005.|
|Publication type:||Journal article|
|Google Scholar cites:||Citations|
|Added by Wikilit team:||Added on initial load|
|Article:||Google Scholar BASE PubMed|
|Other scholarly wikis:||AcaWiki Brede Wiki WikiPapers|
|Web search:||Bing Google Yahoo! — Google PDF|
The vision of access to human knowledge has existed explicitly at least since the time of Aristotle In 1934, Otlet outlined a vision of comprehensive access to knowledge. Progress towards this vision entailed initial visions of hypertext, markup languages, the semantic web, Wikipedia and more recently a series of developments with respect to Open Source. A brief survey of these developments is provided. The rhetoric of the Internet insists that everything should be accessible by everyone at anytime. This poses obvious technical challenges and serious philosophical problems of method. If everything is accessible then how do we separate the chaff from the grain and how do we identify quality? Following a survey of important developments, this essay suggests five dimensions that need to be included in a future web: 1) variants and multiple claims; 2) levels of certainty in making a claim; 3) levels of authority in defending a claim; 4) levels of significance in assessing a claim; 5) levels of thoroughness in dealing with a claim. j 2005 National Instiute of Informatics.
"Hypertext, the semanticweb, Wikipedia and open source have brought many positive steps forward. This paper surveys these developments and outlines some of the challenges that lie ahead."
|Topics:||Epistemology, Reader perceptions of credibility|
|Research design:||Case study|
|Collected data time dimension:||N/A|
|Unit of analysis:||Website|
|Wikipedia data extraction:||N/A|
|Wikipedia page type:||N/A|
|Wikipedia language:||Not specified|
"To this end, we have suggested that five new features that need to be added to such systems; 1) variants and multiple claims; 2) levels of certainty in making a claim; levels of authority in defending a claim; 4) levels of significance in assessing a claim; 5) levels of thouroughness in assessing a claim. If these dimensions are integrated into an open source model there is reason for optimism about the potentials of the emerging technologies. The vision of source knowledge on a fully semantic web may well take at least another century to achieve, but this only confirms that the goal is a noble one."
"Access to the whole of knowledge is becoming feasible with the open source movement with the need to highlight the central importance of quality along with the open access in terms of quantity."