Browse wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system
Abstract Wikipedia is often considered as an examplWikipedia is often considered as an example of ‘collaborative knowledge’. Researchers have contested the value of Wikipedia content on various accounts. Some have disputed the ability of anonymous amateurs to produce quality information, while others have contested Wikipedia’s claim to accuracy and neutrality. Even if these concerns about Wikipedia as an encyclopaedic genre are relevant, they misguidedly focus on human agents only. Wikipedia’s advance is not only enabled by its human resources, but is equally defined by the technological tools and managerial dynamics that structure and maintain its content. This article analyses the sociotechnical system – the intricate collaboration between human users and automated content agents – that defines Wikipedia as a knowledge instrument.fines Wikipedia as a knowledge instrument.
Added by wikilit team Added on initial load  +
Collected data time dimension N/A  +
Comments Applied research methods are 'digital methApplied research methods are 'digital methods', with reference to Rogers' book (2009) "The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA." I would categorize this as an essay that has concrete examples from Wikipedia to support arguments.mples from Wikipedia to support arguments.
Conclusion "In this article, we have argued that Wiki"In this article, we have argued that Wikipedia’s nature and quality should be evaluated in terms of collaborative qualities, not only of its human users, but specifically of its human and non-human actors. Since 2002, Wikipedia content has been maintained by both tool-assisted human editors and bots, and collaboration has been modulated by protocols and strict managerial hierarchies. Bots are systematically deployed to detect and revert vandalism, monitor certain articles and, if necessary, ban users, but they also play a substantial role in the creation and maintenance of entries. As we have shown, bot activity may be analyzed as an indicator of the international or intercultural dimension of Wikipedia as a global project." (p. 1383) Wikipedia as a global project." (p. 1383)
Data source N/A  +
Google scholar url  +
Has author Sabine Niederer + , José van Dijck +
Has domain Information science +
Has topic Size of Wikipedia + , Collaboration software +
Issue 8  +
Pages 1368-1387  +
Peer reviewed Yes  +
Publication type Journal article  +
Published in New Media & Society +
Publisher Sage +
Research design Conceptual  +
Research questions "how Wikipedia’s automated technological s"how Wikipedia’s automated technological systems and the management of large numbers of edits are inextricably intertwined" (p. 1369-1370) "More philosophically, we want to theorize human and machine contributions as complementary parts of a sociotechnical system that lies at the heart of many Web 2.0 platforms." (p. 1370)eart of many Web 2.0 platforms." (p. 1370)
Revid 11,110  +
Theories Sociotechnical theories including references to Bruno Latour and Gilles Deleuze
Theory type Analysis  +
Title Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system
Unit of analysis Website  +
Url  +
Volume 12  +
Wikipedia coverage Main topic  +
Wikipedia data extraction N/A  +
Wikipedia language Multiple  +
Wikipedia page type N/A  +
Year 2010  +
Creation dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 14 August 2012 22:20:19  +
Categories Size of Wikipedia  + , Collaboration software  + , Information science  + , Publications  +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 30 January 2014 20:33:09  +
show properties that link here 


Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.