Negotiating the role of sources: educators' conceptions of credibility in participatory media

From WikiLit
Revision as of 20:30, January 30, 2014 by Fnielsen (Talk | contribs) (Text replace - "|collected_datatype=" to "|data_source=")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Publication (help)
Negotiating the Role of Sources: Educators' Conceptions of Credibility in Participatory Media
Authors: Helena Francke, Olof Sundin [edit item]
Citation: Library & Information Science Research 34 (3): 169–175. 2012.
Publication type: Journal article
Peer-reviewed: Yes
Database(s):
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.12.004.
Google Scholar cites: Citations
Link(s): Paper link
Added by Wikilit team: No
Search
Article: Google Scholar BASE PubMed
Other scholarly wikis: AcaWiki Brede Wiki WikiPapers
Web search: Bing Google Yahoo!Google PDF
Other:
Services
Format: BibTeX
Negotiating the Role of Sources: Educators' Conceptions of Credibility in Participatory Media is a publication by Helena Francke, Olof Sundin.


[edit] Abstract

Participatory media are commonly used in today's society for a variety of purposes. The credibility associated with these media is sometimes contested, and their acceptance into school practices has been debated. Focus group interviews with teachers and librarians in upper secondary schools in Sweden are used to investigate conceptions and experiences of activities involving the critical evaluation of participatory media, with a particular focus on Wikipedia. Three themes are addressed. The first concerns how the teaching of the critical evaluation of sources is organized and comanaged between teachers and librarians. The second describes educators' experiences of print versus digital media, and their worry because students have problems negotiating the information architecture of print media. The third theme deals with conceptions of the credibility of Wikipedia. Four conceptions of credibility are identified: credibility is associated with the control and stability of a source; it is considered to be strengthened when several sources support a claim; it is viewed as situational and partial, rather than absolute; and it is associated with a multiplicity of voices and democratic forms of production. These findings may be used to inform educational activities around credibility and authority in schools by raising self-awareness among educators of various ways to talk about the credibility of sources with both colleagues and students.

[edit] Research questions

Research details

Topics: Reader perceptions of credibility [edit item]
Domains: Education, Library science [edit item]
Theory type: Missing theory_type [edit item]
Wikipedia coverage: [edit item]
Theories: [edit item]
Research design: Other [edit item]
Data source: Interview responses [edit item]
Collected data time dimension: [edit item]
Unit of analysis: Missing unit_of_analysis [edit item]
Wikipedia data extraction: Missing wikipedia_data_extraction [edit item]
Wikipedia page type: Missing wikipedia_page_type [edit item]
Wikipedia language: Missing wikipedia_language [edit item]

[edit] Conclusion

[edit] Comments


Further notes[edit]

Library and information science

Facts about "Negotiating the role of sources: educators' conceptions of credibility in participatory media"RDF feed
AbstractParticipatory media are commonly used in tParticipatory media are commonly used in today's society for a variety of purposes. The credibility associated with these media is sometimes contested, and their acceptance into school practices has been debated. Focus group interviews with teachers and librarians in upper secondary schools in Sweden are used to investigate conceptions and experiences of activities involving the critical evaluation of participatory media, with a particular focus on Wikipedia. Three themes are addressed. The first concerns how the teaching of the critical evaluation of sources is organized and comanaged between teachers and librarians. The second describes educators' experiences of print versus digital media, and their worry because students have problems negotiating the information architecture of print media. The third theme deals with conceptions of the credibility of Wikipedia. Four conceptions of credibility are identified: credibility is associated with the control and stability of a source; it is considered to be strengthened when several sources support a claim; it is viewed as situational and partial, rather than absolute; and it is associated with a multiplicity of voices and democratic forms of production. These findings may be used to inform educational activities around credibility and authority in schools by raising self-awareness among educators of various ways to talk about the credibility of sources with both colleagues and students.sources with both colleagues and students.
Added by wikilit teamNo +
Data sourceInterview responses +
DoiHttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.12.004 +
Google scholar urlhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?ie=UTF-8&q=%22Negotiating%2Bthe%2BRole%2Bof%2BSources%3A%2BEducators%27%2BConceptions%2Bof%2BCredibility%2Bin%2BParticipatory%2BMedia%22 +
Has authorHelena Francke + and Olof Sundin +
Has domainEducation + and Library science +
Has topicReader perceptions of credibility +
Issue3 +
Pages169–175 +
Peer reviewedYes +
Publication typeJournal article +
Published inLibrary & Information Science Research +
Research designOther +
Revid10,881 +
TitleNegotiating the Role of Sources: Educators' Conceptions of Credibility in Participatory Media
Urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818812000370 +
Volume34 +
Year2012 +