Difference between revisions of "Enhancing cluster labeling using Wikipedia"
Fnielsenbot (Talk | contribs) m (added_by_wikilit_team field added) |
m (Text replace - "([ ][|]research_design=)([^ ]*Experiment)([^ ]*[ ][|]collected_datatype=)([^ ]*)([^ ]*[ ])" to "\1\2\3Experiment responses, \4\5") |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|theories=Undetermined | |theories=Undetermined | ||
|research_design=Experiment | |research_design=Experiment | ||
− | |collected_datatype=Archival records, Wikipedia pages | + | |collected_datatype=Experiment responses, Archival records, Wikipedia pages |
|collected_data_time_dimension=Cross-sectional | |collected_data_time_dimension=Cross-sectional | ||
|unit_of_analysis=Article | |unit_of_analysis=Article |
Revision as of 18:42, October 18, 2013
Publication (help) | |
---|---|
Enhancing cluster labeling using Wikipedia | |
Authors: | David Carmel, Haggai Roitman, Naama Zwerdling [edit item] |
Citation: | SIGIR '09 Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval : 139-146. 2009 July 19-23. Boston, MA, United states. Association for Computing Machinery. |
Publication type: | Conference paper |
Peer-reviewed: | Yes |
Database(s): | |
DOI: | 10.1145/1571941.1571967. |
Google Scholar cites: | Citations |
Link(s): | Paper link |
Added by Wikilit team: | Added on initial load |
Search | |
Article: | Google Scholar BASE PubMed |
Other scholarly wikis: | AcaWiki Brede Wiki WikiPapers |
Web search: | Bing Google Yahoo! — Google PDF |
Other: | |
Services | |
Format: | BibTeX |
Contents
[edit] Abstract
This work investigates cluster labeling enhancement by utilizing Wikipedia, the free on-line encyclopedia. We describe a general framework for cluster labeling that extracts candidate labels from Wikipedia in addition to important terms that are extracted directly from the text. The labeling quality" of each candidate is then evaluated by several independent judges and the top evaluated candidates are recommended for labeling. Our experimental results reveal that the Wikipedia labels agree with manual labels associated by humans to a cluster much more than with significant terms that are extracted directly from the text. We show that in most cases even when human's associated label appears in the text pure statistical methods have difficulty in identifying them as good descriptors. Furthermore our experiments show that for more than 85\% of the clusters in our test collection the manual label (or an inflection or a synonym of it) appears in the top five labels recommended by our system. Copyright 2009 {ACM.}"
[edit] Research questions
"This work investigates cluster labeling enhancement by uti- lizing Wikipedia, the free on-line encyclopedia. We describe a general framework for cluster labeling that extracts candi- date labels from Wikipedia in addition to important terms that are extracted directly from the text. The“labeling qual- ity” of each candidate is then evaluated by several indepen- dent judges and the top evaluated candidates are recom- mended for labeling."
Research details
Topics: | Ranking and clustering systems [edit item] |
Domains: | Computer science [edit item] |
Theory type: | Design and action [edit item] |
Wikipedia coverage: | Sample data [edit item] |
Theories: | "Undetermined" [edit item] |
Research design: | Experiment [edit item] |
Data source: | [edit item] |
Collected data time dimension: | Cross-sectional [edit item] |
Unit of analysis: | Article [edit item] |
Wikipedia data extraction: | Clone [edit item] |
Wikipedia page type: | Article [edit item] |
Wikipedia language: | Not specified [edit item] |
[edit] Conclusion
"Cluster labeling withWikipedia is extremely successful, as shown by our results, especially in collections of documents whose topics are covered well by Wikipedia concepts. For domain specific collections, with topics that are not com- pletely covered by Wikipedia, the proposed candidates may hurt the system’s performance due to their irrelevance to the documents’ topics. For such collections, an intelligent decision should be made regarding the use of Wikipedia or another external resource; alternatively, a choice could be made to focus only on inner terms for labeling. The deci- sion should be made by analyzing the given collection with respect to Wikipedia. Developing such a collection specific decision making as part of the labeling framework is left for further research."
[edit] Comments
""Cluster labeling withWikipedia is extremely successful, as shown by our results, especially in collections of documents whose topics are covered well by Wikipedia concepts." p. 146"
Further notes[edit]
Abstract | This work investigates cluster labeling en … This work investigates cluster labeling enhancement by utilizing Wikipedia, the free on-line encyclopedia. We describe a general framework for cluster labeling that extracts candidate labels from Wikipedia in addition to important terms that are extracted directly from the text. The labeling quality" of each candidate is then evaluated by several independent judges and the top evaluated candidates are recommended for labeling. Our experimental results reveal that the Wikipedia labels agree with manual labels associated by humans to a cluster much more than with significant terms that are extracted directly from the text. We show that in most cases even when human's associated label appears in the text pure statistical methods have difficulty in identifying them as good descriptors. Furthermore our experiments show that for more than 85\% of the clusters in our test collection the manual label (or an inflection or a synonym of it) appears in the top five labels recommended by our system. Copyright 2009 {ACM.}"nded by our system. Copyright 2009 {ACM.}" |
Added by wikilit team | Added on initial load + |
Collected data time dimension | Cross-sectional + |
Comments | "Cluster labeling withWikipedia is extremely successful, as
shown by our results, especially in collections of documents whose topics are covered well by Wikipedia concepts." p. 146 |
Conclusion | Cluster labeling withWikipedia is extremel … Cluster labeling withWikipedia is extremely successful, as
shown by our results, especially in collections of documents whose topics are covered well by Wikipedia concepts. For domain specific collections, with topics that are not com- pletely covered by Wikipedia, the proposed candidates may hurt the system’s performance due to their irrelevance to the documents’ topics. For such collections, an intelligent decision should be made regarding the use of Wikipedia or another external resource; alternatively, a choice could be made to focus only on inner terms for labeling. The deci- sion should be made by analyzing the given collection with respect to Wikipedia. Developing such a collection specific decision making as part of the labeling framework is left for further research. ng framework is left for further research. |
Conference location | Boston, MA, United states + |
Dates | 19-23 + |
Doi | 10.1145/1571941.1571967 + |
Google scholar url | http://scholar.google.com/scholar?ie=UTF-8&q=%22Enhancing%2Bcluster%2Blabeling%2Busing%2BWikipedia%22 + |
Has author | David Carmel +, Haggai Roitman + and Naama Zwerdling + |
Has domain | Computer science + |
Has topic | Ranking and clustering systems + |
Month | July + |
Pages | 139-146 + |
Peer reviewed | Yes + |
Publication type | Conference paper + |
Published in | SIGIR '09 Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval + |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery + |
Research design | Experiment + |
Research questions | This work investigates cluster labeling en … This work investigates cluster labeling enhancement by uti-
lizing Wikipedia, the free on-line encyclopedia. We describe a general framework for cluster labeling that extracts candi- date labels from Wikipedia in addition to important terms that are extracted directly from the text. The“labeling qual- ity” of each candidate is then evaluated by several indepen- dent judges and the top evaluated candidates are recom- mended for labeling. candidates are recom- mended for labeling. |
Revid | 9,862 + |
Theories | Undetermined |
Theory type | Design and action + |
Title | Enhancing cluster labeling using Wikipedia |
Unit of analysis | Article + |
Url | http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1571967 + |
Wikipedia coverage | Sample data + |
Wikipedia data extraction | Clone + |
Wikipedia language | Not specified + |
Wikipedia page type | Article + |
Year | 2009 + |